"Steve Leyland" wrote in
:

In ,
Puck typed:
: "Steve Leyland" wrote
: in :
:
:: okay, I've already taken #1 on this already in my sig, but thought
:: some of you might like inclusion on this new lits.
:: all applications for "Lits Slut" numbers should be posted in this
:: thread. you'll need to provide conclusive proof of lits sluttiness
:: for consideration and kooks need not apply.
:
: Does one not need to utter words of W0nership before one can feature
: in sigs? I have taken no greater pleasure than being TOS'd and
: sig-featured in my brief, and wholly inaccurate, career as a
: trollette. But right here, right now (Norman Cook, let's not go
: there) I have nothing worthy. Soz.

my dear puck, it is a lits of lits sluts, not name-dropping sluts who
shagged norman cook.

You didn't mention being slut-fussy, sweetie. Your sig implies quite the
contrary anyway.

: To top that off, I have no Flonkness.

and no sig, so why would you want this honour?

It implicates ownership of one's ass. ******s who insist on Max
Cliffording themselves in their own sig, however, will vehemently
disagree. I, however, don't care. Kiss.