View Single Post
  #70   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
Eric Stevens Eric Stevens is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 15
Default Went up to the boat today

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:33:51 -0400, "mr.b" wrote:

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:21:41 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote:

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:01:29 -0400, "mr.b" wrote:

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:08:58 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Correlation does not imply causation. What will the consequences be?
Nobody knows. Computer models don't even agree. Al Gore, of course,
picks the absolutely worst outcome and touts it as gospel, while the
majority of the models show the average increase in temperature
following a very steady and moderate rate. Personally, I'm in favor of
a slight increase in global temperature, and the benefits that will
bring.

None so blind as those who will not see. What part of there being 3X as
much CO2 in the atmosphere as there ever has been in 650,000 years are
you not getting? You can stick your head back in the sand now.


The claim that there is "3X as much CO2 in the atmosphere as there ever
has been in 650,000 years" is wrong at best and a lie at the worst.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../1806245/posts

From the authoritative site you provide for us:

"Free Republic is the premier online gathering place for independent,
grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of
governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to
champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have
fun doing it. Hoo-yah!"

Just wondering but...what the hell does this have to do with climate
change? These guys are almost as clueless as the "experts" listed on the
site shared by the recently plonked KFC. Go read something written by
someone who actually knows something about this issue.


There is nothing like slinging mud, calling names and changing the
subject when it comes to responding to an argument you can't deal
with.

I gave you the URL because it is the only place on the web where you
can find a reference to the paper. You can if you like buy a copy of
the peer-reviewed paper via Energy & Environment, 18:2 March/April
2007 http://www.multi-science.co.uk/ee.htm

It might be a good idea. Then you would be able to deal with the
facts.



Eric Stevens