"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:08:58 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:

Correlation does not imply causation. What will the consequences be?
Nobody knows. Computer models don't even agree. Al Gore, of course,
picks
the absolutely worst outcome and touts it as gospel, while the
majority of
the models show the average increase in temperature following a very
steady and moderate rate. Personally, I'm in favor of a slight
increase in
global temperature, and the benefits that will bring.

None so blind as those who will not see. What part of there being 3X
as
much CO2 in the atmosphere as there ever has been in 650,000 years are
you
not getting? You can stick your head back in the sand now.


Three times as much, I think not.

Here is the present accepted percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere from:
http://www.met.fsu.edu/explores/atmcomp.html

VARIABLE gases in the atmosphere and typical percentage values a

Water vapor 0 to 4%
Carbon Dioxide 0.035%
Methane 0.0002%
Ozone 0.000004%

Note the term "variable." That means it's normal for the percentages to
change from time to time.


Carbon Dioxide 0.035% That's 35/100 of one percent. About 1/3 of one
percent.

So you are claiming 650,000 years ago that was only about 0.012%? 1)
prove it 2) prove that 650,000 years ago is the BENCHMARK figure
(keeping in mind that there's been life on earth for millions, if not
billions, of years.)

Can't do it? Surprise, surprise! Until you can prove it beyond a
reasonable doubt your argument is as impotent as you are.

Wilbur Hubbard