Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk said
Sean Dumbarse Git wrote
miguel wrote
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote
miguel said
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote
miguel said
Dumbarse Git wrote
miguel

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand
by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack,
and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I
thought I made that clear.

Yet you did it anyway.

The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats.
I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my
comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". Then
your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office
address several times. He upped the anti.

It's "ante," Doc. You probably know that in your less foamy moments,
though. And yes, I did. Sometimes that happens when you are at a poker
table.

He was probably so
foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of
seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true
character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness.

So it is safe to say that you consider Sean, K-Bitch, Bill and ****stain
to be no better than Brad Jesness? They have done to me precisely what I
am doing to you.

I
explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his
response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in
fact he did jump the gun.

It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade.

You are not very bright, so let me spell this out for you as simply as I
can. Rhonda called my offer for a cease fire negotiation, after Sean
called it extortion. Her comment did not pertain to the original act of
posting your personal information.

Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they?

You are not intelligent enough to reconcile them.

The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you
should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right
to attempt to mitigate his damages.

Equity is for everyone, Sean.

I agree with this part of the post. 100%

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.

http//www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel

Kali [Kimberly K. Barnard, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Parkside]

miguel