In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said:
: "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
:
: miguel wrote in
: :
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
: Psychology, wrote:
: miguel said:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
: of Psychology
: (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
: miguel said:
: Dumbarse Git wrote:
: miguel:
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
:
: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
: you admit to in another thread),
:
: You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
: occupation.
:
: I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
: Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
: and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.
:
: yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
: (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.
:
: I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
: ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
: please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
: I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
: the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
: to said award.
:
: If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
: Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
: occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
: has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
: posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
: needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
: google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
: stopping yourself.
:
: Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
:
: You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
: what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
: all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
: choice.
:
: The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
: to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
: your behalf?
:
: It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
:
: Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
: let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
: unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
: I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
: pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
: realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
: kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.
:
: Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
: of Wisconsin-Parkside,
: http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/
:
: Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
: voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
: entertainment out of a bully.
:
: And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
: affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
: hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
: defense of him and wish you'd stop.
:
: I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
: people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
: asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
: get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
: way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.
:
: Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.
:
: You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
: decided to join in. So solly.
:
: Threat noted.
:
: I hope so.
:
: If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
: frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
: pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
: keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
: Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.
:
: Wow. Extortion attempt.
:
: No.
:
: It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

****ing wrong, Rhonda. We discussed this the other day. I stand
by what I said, that I don't think it's right to Google stack,
and I certainly don't indend to call *anyone* a "dog****er". I
thought I made that clear.

The discussion was double standards and miguel's kooky threats.
I made an example comparison (libel and assault). In my
comparison, I used his last name and the word "dog****er". Then
your sweetheart came back and spammed my full name and office
address several times. He upped the anti. He was probably so
foamy he thought I was chiming in with the others, so instead of
seeking clarification, he shot his load, revealing his true
character: that of a coward no better than Brad Jesness. I
explained this in fewer words in an earlier post, and his
response was to repeat his cowardly behavior. No remorse, if in
fact he did jump the gun.

It wasn't negotiation, it was retaliation. Call a spade a spade.

Your "ethics" are highly conditional, aren't they?

: The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you
: should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right
: to attempt to mitigate his damages.
:
: Equity is for everyone, Sean.
:
: Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
: Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.
:
: http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel
:

Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein