"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
miguel wrote in news
-
:
Ki[*BIG *SNIP*]
You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you
admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of ethics
to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone
else.
Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
If that was his campaign speech, then repeatedly posting "dog****er"
with his name and profession--along with the creation of that offensive
web site and the revenge froup--can be yours.
The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be
acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your
behalf?
I don't find *either* acceptable, but (and it's a big "but") I will not
be critical of him for following the standard of behavior you've set as
acceptable.
What part of "you started it" escapes your attention? shakes head
Personally identifiable information is personally identifiable
information. You want to say that what you're doing to him doesn't
identify him as clearly as what he's doing to Kali. I say you can't
split that hair, because it does.
I have no doubt that if you stop, he'll stop. But your apparent idea
that he should stop while you continue is, at best, egocentric.
(The use of the word "you" in this post should be construed
collectively, and not as directed at you, specifically, Sean, except to
the extent that you, specifically, have engaged in the named behavior.)
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay