Kali wrote:
Sean Monaghan said:
miguel wrote:
Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk":

That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to
words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike.

See http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html#question27

"27. Can I really be thrown in jail for posting threatening messages?

Yes. People have been tried and convicted for sending threatening or
harassing Email or Usenet posts. We do NOT support censorship of the
Internet; however, posting a message stating you are going to cause
virtual or unvirtual harm to someone will probably gain you a visit
from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent."

"Probably" gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent?

That's plain stupid.

If Chaney wants to call the FBI and complain, more power to him.

That would be one of the most hilarious things to happen 'round these
parts in a while. It would be quite entertaining.

That's the bit that you and your public defender are missing - AUK is
*all* about entertainment. Always. No exceptions. Period.

That would be almost as entertaining as [name] filing a civil
suit over having had his name and "dog****er" listed together in
the Google archives.

You are now participating in the google stacking effort yourself? That
seems odd, as you acknowledged you've been a victim of it too.

You see, Sean, on Usenet it's not ok to call [name] a
"dog****er", but it is ok for him to make kooky death threats.
Get it? lol

Charlotte was right about me. I'm sorry you weren't more resilient.

miguel