View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
Rhonda Lea Kirk Rhonda Lea Kirk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Default [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking
usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying
to accomplish.
Good job there kOOk.
miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical
violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the
St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words
of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in
a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM
nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies
him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest
lifetime-achievement award for stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for
those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory
will ever make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?
The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous -
not Cranston's threat.

How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing
what predicated it?

Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for
another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on
Usenet.


Life-threatening?


Any type of a beating that requires hospitalisation is potentially
life-threatening.


Beating?


Okay, I'm not going to keep this up. You tried to bat me around in the
other part of the thread about making assumptions, but you've made an
incredible leap--"Evel does the Snake River Canyon" comes to mind--that
I can't even keep my eye on your rocket.

You can--and will, I'm sure--continue with the hyperbole. I've voiced my
objections, and I find it contemptible. But there's not a lot to be
gained beating my head against the wall over childish bullying either.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay