Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote:
Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk":
That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to
words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike.
See http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html#question27
"27. Can I really be thrown in jail for posting threatening messages?

Yes. People have been tried and convicted for sending threatening or
harassing Email or Usenet posts. We do NOT support censorship of the
Internet; however, posting a message stating you are going to cause
virtual or unvirtual harm to someone will probably gain you a visit
from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent."

"Probably" gain you a visit from your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent?

That's plain stupid.

If Chaney wants to call the FBI and complain, more power to him.

That would be one of the most hilarious things to happen 'round these
parts in a while. It would be quite entertaining.

I'll be sure and let you know if they knock on my door. Don't hold your
breath though.

That's the bit that you and your public defender are missing - AUK is
*all* about entertainment. Always. No exceptions. Period.

That was a pretty stupid thing to say, in that (1) neither my PD nor I
is unaware of this and (2) it's obvious what she is complaining about is
that the hypocrisy of what you are doing is in part what makes it
unentertaining for her. It's like somebody who is a narcissistic
sociopath calling her humor deficient. Precisely who would be
entertained by that?

miguel