"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...
The ability to own the land one lives upon is one of the most basic
and vital sources of, and expressions of, liberty. And you act as if
it's nothing more than a privilege? Hardly seems consistent with
your usual politics.


Where have you been? Don't you remember the recent Supreme Court
decision that states it is legal for government to condemn private
property for no other reason than so it can be sold to a developer in
order to increase the tax base? A total abuse of the eminent domain
principle.

So much for the ability to own land. Not only that, but try not
paying taxes on the land you "own" and see how long it takes before
they take it away from you.

Keep electing those Democrats. They appoint liberal judges who
legislate from the bench and take away right after right. Keep
blaming everybody but yourself for enabling these rapists. After all
it wasn't your vote that put them there. Yah right!

Wilbur Hubbard

A: The Supreme Court was wrong.
B: I am entirely aware of the lack of Allodial Title, and intimately
aware that one does not have freehold to land "owned" in the United
States -- neither did I say that it is right. To the contrary, it
supports my original statement.
C: I have never voted for a Democrat, nor for a Republican.

You should vote for the most conservative candidate (who has a chance of
winning) available in any election. Party affiliation should not be the
deciding factor. The main difference between conservative candidates and
liberal candidates is no Democrat candidate is conservative. Some
conservative candidates are not necessary Republicans. The Libertarian
Party candidates are generally more conservative than Republican
candidates. However, to date at least, you have thrown your vote right
down the toilet voting for a candidate who has no chance of winning. By
wasting your vote you have, in effect, given liberals one more vote for
their socialist agenda.

Wilbur Hubbard