"Dave" wrote in message
...

Neal, every time you open your mouth on legal topics you further
demonstrate
your ignorance.


In sum, we conclude that Heller has standing to raise his § 1983
challenge to specific provisions of the District's gun control laws.

III
As we noted, the Second Amendment provides: A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people
to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
U.S. CONST. amend. II.

Specific provisions. Just like I said. They are just squabbling about
specific provisions. They haven't struck down the entire law. Just the
dismissed case in question.

Wilbur Hubbard