BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

On 18 Aug 2003 04:08:19 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 15 Aug 2003 03:56:23 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 14 Aug 2003 04:10:05 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Now you're acting just like skipper, with your snipping of the relevant
facts that prove you're a moron.

Or, do you just get everything you've ever known from websites?
Newsflash, there, idiot. MOST websites dealing with martial arts tell
you that stuff. To a SMALL extent, it's true. Ever watch blackbelts
train? Calm? Not in the LEAST!

Why are you afraid to answer the simple question that is on topic to
this thread and reveals nothing about your personal life. Do you think
NONE of the oil vapor that makes it's way back to the intake manifold
via the PCV valve gets burned?

Why? Because YOU, Steve, have written in this thread that I don't know
about Karate. Also, YOU have implied, through this thread, that YOU DO

I have no idea what you know about karate. I do know that you claim to
be a student of karate and yet you do not follow it's principles and
don't even know what those principles are.

Please provide where you've gotten your training. You must be trained
in Karate to be able to say that somebody who HAS trained in the art
for quite a period of time, don't know anything about it.!

Why do you care where I've gotten my training? I'm not claiming you
don't have training in karate. But it is self evident that you don't
follow the principles, either because you don't follow the training
you've gotten or you just don't know what those principles are. I've
already given examples of where your actions deviate from any training
you might have received in karate.

know about Karate. Now, because of this implication, I'd like to see
just what you really do know about Karate. In particular American
Kenpo Karate, Ed Parker system??

I know that you don't practice the principles of karate when you are
stalking people on the internet threatening them with violence.

Uh, I'm the one being stalked, idiot.

Maybe in your own mind you're being stalked. But on this newsgroup, you
are the one stalking others by asking them to meet you and threatening
them with physical violence, breaking necks, etc. Now that I've
answered your questions again, can you answer my question: Do you think
NNE of the oil vapor that makes it's way back to the intake manifold va
the PCV valve gets burned?

Nah, Steve, you stupid old man. You see, I get tired of drawn up
pieces of crap like you and Joe, hiding behind newsgroups. You name
call, etc. real well, when hiding behind a newsgroup, like hiding
behind mommy's skirt. But it's a different story when asked to do so
in person, huh? But, alas, you shouldn't be afraid, you've got Karate
training, right? Where did you take that training? Rank? Dojo?
Lineage? Oh, you don't know, right?

Nah, DimDummy, you stupid old man. What you get tired of is being
proven a dumb idiot with every post you make. That's why you won't
answer any more direct questions, because you now realize you're just a
stupid fool who doesn't know squat about anything. Here's a short list
of the things you've been wrong about in just this single thread that so
beautifully demonstrates your stupidity. I'm probably missing a few
things because there's so much you were wrong about, but here goes:

You're wrong when you said an engine normally burns NO oil. Your
ineptness in defending that indefensible position led you to be wrong
about a whole host of things, including:

When a wiper wipes a viscous liquid off a surface, you claimed that the
speed of the wiper does not affect how much liquid is left on the
surface. That's wrong.

When a wiper wipes a viscous liquid off a surface, you claimed that the
temperature of the liquid directly affects how much liquid is left on
the surface. That's wrong. The viscosity does, not the temperature.
The temp may or may not affect the viscosity.

You're wrong when you claim that there must be visible blue smoke if an
engine is burning any oil, even minute amounts.

When oil gets through the exhaust valve stem of a running engine, it
ends up being burned. You're wrong when you claimed it doesn't.

You're wrong when you claim that saying something was "consumed in the
combustion process" is not the same thing as saying it "burned".

You were wrong when you said the GM reference never says that an engine
looses oil on the cylinder wall. It does, and the reference does say
that.

You're wrong in thinking that the oil pressure gauge is reading the
force of the oil against the wiper ring.

You're wrong when you say that the pressure against the walls of the
crankcase is constant everywhere when the engine is running. Turbulence
causes that not to be true.

You're wrong when you claim that the pressure against the top of the
piston in a running normal air compressor is the same as the pressure in
the tank.

You're wrong when you claim that the force against the top of the rings
is the same as the force everywhere else in the cylinder.

You're wrong when you claimed that I was the first person to start
calling names. You were.

You're wrong when you claimed that I was first person to call someone a
little school girl. You did

You're wrong when you claimed that you never called on your daughter to
defend you.

You're wrong when you claimed that I screwed some woman out of her child
support.

You're wrong when you claimed that karate does not teach etiquette.

You're wrong when you claimed that karate does not teach not to panic
and to remain calm when confronted.

You're wrong when you claim that under the principles of karate, it's ok
to physically attack your opponent first if you think you need to defend
your honor.

And all that is just what I quickly found from one thread. I'm sure
there's a lot more things you were wrong about. Sad thing is, there's
nothing you were right about.

Steve