On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 04:21:07 +0000, Steve Leyland wrote:

mimus wrote:
: On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:52:16 +0000, Steve Leyland wrote:
:
:: Diarrhoea ,``..;;~~ . wrote:
::
::: On 25 Feb, 09:31, "Steve Leyland"
::: wrote:
:::
:::: Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
::::
::::: Be it known that there exists in the world a subset of men of
::::: small mind. In this subset of inferior individuals there are
::::: always a few who are in the upper percentile of the inferior
::::: subset. Like cream they rise to the top. But, like blue cheese
::::: they reek of decay. For they are capable of rising to the top
::::: only in an inferior subset and, by definition, cannot fathom what
::::: it takes to be as much as a bottom dweller in a mediocre subset
::::: of individuals, let alone an ultimate individual in the most
::::: intelligent of subsets. Steve Leyland has demonstrated he is one
::::: of the upper crust, inferior subset, small minds. I am an
::::: ultimate in the most intelligent of subsets.
::::
:::: ooohh cool, nice fanboi rant and a shiny new thread in my honour
:::: but I'll gladly debate this with you.
:::::
::::: Mr. Leyland has staked out the laughable position of Usenet
::::: control freak. He attempts to do so imposing his limited
::::: understanding, imbued by his lack of potential, exemplified by
::::: his lowly status of an upper crust, inferior subset mind but is
::::: unable to break the surly bonds of stunted biological potential.
::::: While he decries netKKKops, he fails to understand he is himself
::::: a netKKKop. However, instead of using standard netKKKop tactics
::::: of repeated and ofttimes bogus complaints to news and Internet
::::: providers in an attempt to stifle freedom of speech by
::::: intimidation and removal, Mr. Leyland uses inferior subset
::::: tactics such as flooding newsgroups with all manner of juvenile
::::: connivances and lame threats in a laughable attempt to stifle
::::: free speech by intimidation.
::::
:::: in what way do I "flood" newsgroups?
:::: what exactly are these "lame threats"
:::: to which you refer?
:::: in what way are my posts intimidating?
:::: how do my easily killfile-able posts stifle free speech, as I NEVER
:::: use sock puppets or morph to escape the killfiles of those who
:::: choose to ignore me..clearly unlike yourself, hypocrite?
:::
::: YOU use sock-puppet Steve
::
:: actually jeanne, no I do not.
::
::: You have lost admitt it. You are Fred Hall and the real old Zack and
::: you have used hundreds of socks the last years.
::
:: nope. please do learn to read headers.
::
::: "Warning to all:
::: Steve Leyland is a trolling **** of the highest order. Killfile the
::: muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on his past
::: UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned. *plonk*"
::
:: well yeah, I agree with that. in fact I'm quite proud of it which is
:: exactly why I always post as myself.
:
: There's a lot of work involved in building up a nym's cred like that.

it is actually my real name. I'm in so much trouble with online stalkers
now aren't I?

At least you haven't posted your phone-number yet.

--


smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Whatever are we to do to show the
true harmony and peace that rule here,
somewhat disguised at the moment by
the apparent disorder now seemingly in
progress?

Laumer