"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
Joe, hate to burst your bubble, but Saddam did destroy and not attempt to
rebuild his WMDs.

Maybe...but he failed to allow inspetor to inspect, he fired weapons
at our planes in the no fly zones, he basically failed to live up to
his surrender for invading Kuwait. Remember thats the place were he
torched 100's of oil wells.

Actually he did allow them back in and we pulled them out. Check it out. I'm
not making it up.


This was a combination of Saddam misreading Bush and of
Bush LYING about why we should invade. If Bush didn't know the facts, he
should have searched them out. He didn't.

Yeah maybe he should of sucked Saddams dick too huh Jon?
IIRC every member of congress voted to take out Saddam except one
coward.

Maybe you should have volunteered to do that.

You mean one person who stood up for what was right, which according to the
right-wingnuts was a coward (and coincidently right).

Which Hitler is that? Saddam or the president of Iran, who is a
slimeball,
but apparently not in charge of the people supplying the weapons in Iraq.

Well Saddams dead and in Hell, so it must be the other one huh? If
that clown can not stem the flow of weapons used to murder American
establishing freedom for the Iraqi people then maybe we need to
encourage him and let him know it's better for him to deal with the
criminals than have us do it with B-52's. After all he is the elected
leader.

Which one? The president of Iran or the religious leader? We wouldn't want
to nuke the wrong Hitler.

Yup... another useless war... one we can't win and will just make the
situation worse.

You make think 160 of our guys getting murdered is a usless reason to
fight back... I do not.

So, nuke millions of people because of the death of 160. Sounds quite
hitler-like to me.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com