"katy" wrote in message
...
Mundo wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:46:50 -0500, katy wrote
(in article ):


Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"Maxprop" wrote in message
arthlink.net...



"Capt. JG" wrote in message



Wrong about what? There are typically no corporate rules about
dating a co-worker, boss, or subordinate. It might not be a good
idea, but it's not against the law.

Most sexual harassment suits aren't matters of criminal codes. They
are civil suits.




If there are such rules, they're hard to enforce.

Enforcement is irrelevant. If the secretary sues the boss after
being dumped, she generally wins. We're talking civil suits, not
criminal trials.


Perjury is perjury.




Sometimes the result is messy and sometimes the result is a lawsuit,
but that isn't the norm. Lots of people meet each other at work. I
know a couple that share a job. They work in the same office. I know
another couple who were boss/employee. It didn't workout, but no one
sued. This really sounds like corporate or gov't intrusion into
people's personal lives. I say it's none of their business unless it
crosses the line into quid pro quo.

No one is intruding in anyone's business. It's a matter of civil
litigation, Jon. Not lawbreaking. You have a tough time with that
distinction, don't you?


So, which is it... should Clinton have been in civil court or criminal
court?



Civil for the sexual harrassment issues and criminal for the lying
about it...he perjured himself...that's criminal...



And, compared to what Bush lied about, you think that's about the same
level, right?



I didn't know Bush lied in a court of law...didn't know he had been
brought up on charges...it has not been proven that Bush lied...it has
been proven that Clinton lied...when Bush is tried and prosecuted for
lying, that would be a different situation...but that hasn't
happened...and won't happen...and until; then, if you are an upholder of
the Constitution, you must proceed as if he were innocent...give it a
rest...


Katy,
Even Bush has admitted he was wrong/ spin for lying. Maybe it is time to
get on with the reality. I hate to be the one to break it to you. Is it
2008 yet?

Since when is the admission of being wrong a lie? But then, not many here
would be able to answer that since no one here is ever wrong...Call for
his impeachment...get him to trial...prove it..until then, he's deemed
innocent...


He admitted he mislead the people re the Rumsfeld resignation. He lied on
national TV when he said he never used the term "cut and run" with respect
to Democrats. He's lied at least that many times, and he's probably lied a
lot more. I think we should find out.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com