Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...


"Capt. JG" wrote in message


Wrong about what? There are typically no corporate rules about dating a
co-worker, boss, or subordinate. It might not be a good idea, but it's
not against the law.

Most sexual harassment suits aren't matters of criminal codes. They are
civil suits.



If there are such rules, they're hard to enforce.

Enforcement is irrelevant. If the secretary sues the boss after being
dumped, she generally wins. We're talking civil suits, not criminal
trials.


Perjury is perjury.



Sometimes the result is messy and sometimes the result is a lawsuit, but
that isn't the norm. Lots of people meet each other at work. I know a
couple that share a job. They work in the same office. I know another
couple who were boss/employee. It didn't workout, but no one sued. This
really sounds like corporate or gov't intrusion into people's personal
lives. I say it's none of their business unless it crosses the line into
quid pro quo.

No one is intruding in anyone's business. It's a matter of civil
litigation, Jon. Not lawbreaking. You have a tough time with that
distinction, don't you?


So, which is it... should Clinton have been in civil court or criminal
court?



Civil for the sexual harrassment issues and criminal for the lying about
it...he perjured himself...that's criminal...



And, compared to what Bush lied about, you think that's about the same
level, right?


I didn't know Bush lied in a court of law...didn't know he had been
brought up on charges...it has not been proven that Bush lied...it has
been proven that Clinton lied...when Bush is tried and prosecuted for
lying, that would be a different situation...but that hasn't
happened...and won't happen...and until; then, if you are an upholder of
the Constitution, you must proceed as if he were innocent...give it a
rest...