Martin Baxter wrote:
katy wrote:


So, which is it... should Clinton have been in civil court or criminal
court?



Civil for the sexual harrassment issues and criminal for the lying about
it...he perjured himself...that's criminal...


You'd press a criminal prosecution upon a President for such a small
thing? In the overall scheme of things the only thing that would be
accomplished would be to further harm the repution of the USA. Ask
yourself why Ford gave Nixon immunity.

Cheers
Marty
------------ And now a word from our sponsor ---------------------
For a secure high performance FTP using SSL/TLS encryption
upgrade to SurgeFTP
---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_surgeftp.htm ----

He shouldn'y have...he would have been re-elected if he had not pardoned
Nixon and the US would have had a decent and moral President for 6 years....