"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:



You're a lawyer working on sexual harassment litigation I presume? I
doubt it. Are you saying that all the 1000s of businesses are wrong?



I'm a retired HR Manager with experience in this and you are wrong...



Wrong about what? There are typically no corporate rules about dating a
co-worker, boss, or subordinate. It might not be a good idea, but it's
not against the law. If there are such rules, they're hard to enforce.
Sometimes the result is messy and sometimes the result is a lawsuit,
but that isn't the norm. Lots of people meet each other at work. I know
a couple that share a job. They work in the same office. I know another
couple who were boss/employee. It didn't workout, but no one sued. This
really sounds like corporate or gov't intrusion into people's personal
lives. I say it's none of their business unless it crosses the line
into quid pro quo.

WHAT???? You've been in Calidornia too long...there are plenty of
corporations in the midwest that vertainly do have those kind of
policies in place, especially regarding a boss/employee
relationship....get yuour head out of the sand, Jon...California is not
the world...


It's not, but it is the largest state. We do things right from time to
time.

Like your energy policy? Like your immigration policies?

Sorry, couldn't help that. Too convenient.

Max



I guess that's how the fly-over states feel.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com