"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message

He lied about a consenual affair between two adults.

President of the United States and a youthful intern. This would be
sexual harassment of the most grievous kind.

It would be if she wasn't interested or felt pressure. It was her idea I
believe.

Doesn't matter. When a person in an ultimate power position makes or
accepts advances from a bottom dweller, it's harassment. Check out some of
the court's decisions on such cases. If Monica had filed sexual harassment
charges against him, he'd likely have been convicted. My guess is that she
was paid off to forget the whole thing.


So, now you're saying it was ok to out an agent? I believe that's a
federal offense.

The evidence today points to someone else--neither Libby nor Cheney. Where
have you been? The charges against Libby are for obstruction of justice,
not outing Plame.


Your Bush-hating bias clouds your "thinking" to the point of being a
redundant, hateful mantra, Jon. Lighten up.

Come on. We all know they lied. You're just trying to justify it by
talking about Clinton's foibles. He was found not guilty by the Senate
dude.

He was found guilty by a federal court for lying to a federal grand jury.

Show me one piece of evidence that Bush lied about WMDs prior to the Iraq
war? Hint: you can't, because he didn't. He was misinformed by the intel
community. And no doubt he was happy to have a reason to invade Iraq, but
he expected to find WMDs in Iraq and was just as puzzled as the rest of us
why none were uncovered.

Responding to bad intel is not lying, no matter how you spin it. It may
have been stupidity, but not deception.

Max