Flying Pig News, late edition...
Don W wrote:
Geoff,
Geoff Schultz wrote:
Don W wrote in
. net:
Hi Rosie,
I don't see what is the big deal about getting a couple of
crewmembers to go on the longer passages. Worst case, you spend a
little more on the provisions.
Personally, I decided some time ago that to do the Pacific I want at
least four capable people on the boat. This allows for 12 hour
two-person shifts at sea, as well as two people on the boat at all
times for anchor watch once you arrive. Only two people on the boat
is too much work for me. I'm cruising to have fun!
If you think that 12 hour shifts are a good idea, then I never want to
sail with you! I personally think that 3 people crews work great.
You get 4 on, 8 off. If there's a problem, then you've got 1 person
who's been down for at least 4 hours. Anything more than 4 hours at
night is too long.
-- Geoff
A 12 hour two-person shift allows each person to do 2 hours on, 2 hours
off or 3 hours on, 3 hours off with their companion crewperson, and then
to get up to 12 hours of uninterupted rest before coming back on for
another 12 hour two-person shift. If there's a problem, you've got two
people who are on shift to take care of it without waking the two who
are off shift. Also, your 12 hour shift alway starts at the same time
each day, so you don't have to deal with upsetting your sleep cycle.
If you think that this is a bad idea, I believe you must still not quite
understand how the schedule works. It is much better than a 2-person
crew with 3 on / 3 off continuous, or your 3-person crew with 4 on / 8
off except in case of need -- at least for me.
If you still think its a bad idea, I'd really like to understand your
objections.
Don W.
Your original post on 12 hour shifts wasn't clear. I thought you meant
12 continuous hours on shift, which is almost impossible. 3 on, three
off for 12 hours is very doable.
krj
|