"Maxprop" wrote in message
. net...
"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:18:28 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:
He lied and admitted in with respect to Rumsfeld's resignation.
Unresponsive to the question. Repeating the same assertion does not
prove
its truth.
Dave's having reading problems. Do you want me to put the following in
all
caps?
Putting it in all caps doesn't prove its truth either. Please answer
the
question Max asked.
The question was "Could you kindly provide a website detailing his
admission?"
Are you and he really incapable of a simple google search? Ok, that was
a dumb question.
Have at it...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0061108-2.html
I read nothing in that article that indicated Bush admitted to lying
about anything. Care to quote the exact reference you have in mind?
Max
You decide. I guess in your parlance, not telling the truth when asked a
direct question isn't a lie.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. Last week you told us that Secretary Rumsfeld
will be staying on. Why is the timing right now for this, and how much
does it have to do with the election results?
THE PRESIDENT: Right. No, you and Hunt and Keil came in the Oval Office,
and Hunt asked me the question one week before the campaign, and
basically it was, are you going to do something about Rumsfeld and the
Vice President? And my answer was, they're going to stay on. And the
reason why is I didn't want to inject a major decision about this war in
the final days of a campaign. And so the only way to answer that question
and to get you on to another question was to give you that answer.
I guess that could be construed as a lie. And it certainly is much worse
than lying to a federal grand jury about having sex with an intern. NOT.
Max
Well,let's put it this way... Clinton lied about a blow job. How many people
died as a result. Bush lied about the reasons for war. How many people died.
--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com