Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...



Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born
with that ability.


U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any
difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on
the Ralph Nader bandwagon...



Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time.


That's why I hope Giuliani gets the nomination...a vote for Nader is a
vote for Giuliani!



He's pro choice... I don't like him much for other reasons, and he has a lot
of baggage, but he's better than the current officeholder.
I know that's not saying much... g

I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a
state level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the
top level, those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole
pictures, not at isolated instances...