Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"katy" wrote in message
...



Charlie Morgan wrote:



On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:15:55 GMT, "scbafreak via BoatKB.com"
u25927@uwe wrote:





It's easy enough to say something stupid like that but ya gotta
provide some proof. Not everybody's had the logic circuits of their
brains short-circuited by LSD.... Not everybody
believes crap like you, Capt. JG the illegal drug using braggart.

Cheers,
Ellen

Nobody will ever be able to prove conclusively that what we ar edoing
to the
environment is causing climate changes and if there is a significant
event we
will never be able to prove conclusively that it was our fault but we
have a
lot of really good evidence that the pollutants we are putting into
the air
are causing global changes.


It's pretty easy to prove cause and effect as far as humans mowing
down tropical
rainforests causing changes in weather patterns. CWM

That's an entirely different discussion than the CO2 and global warming
discussion...



Actually, it isn't.


Actually, it is....



How so? We're polluting our environment by cutting down the forest and by
burning the vegatation. That produces greenhouse gasses, which
contributes to the global warming. In addition, the lack of trees reduces
the possible absorbtion of those very gasses.

Look it up if you're not too scared.


It contributes to weather change, mostly precipitation...and is the most
easily solvable environmental problem out there...and for the most part,
entirely out of our vontrol because you're not going to convince some 3rd
world country that makes money doing it to stop..unless you go in and kill
em all or something else equally drastic...we have made great strides in
reforestation here in the US especially in Washington and Oregon, which is
where out great rainforest ecists...



Hate to tell you, but several environ groups and several individuals are
doing just that.

Reforestation in the US is great... all for it, but the big problem is in
the 3rd world.

Killing them all is a right-wing solution. g


Nah...in that respect it would be a liberal response...only it wouldn't
be overt but some legislated "act of mercy"...