View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Scotty Scotty is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 50
Default Things that make you gay

Do you think Necrophilia should be legal? Who's the victim?
Who gets hurt?

SBV


"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net..
..

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in

message

reenews.ne
t...

"Maxprop" wrote
Most psychopaths understand the immorality of what they

do. That's
documented fact, not opinion. They do it anyway,

because they want to,
or because it gets them off. Gays, OTOH, don't see

themselves as doing
wrong. Your statement above is ludicrous, Neal.


Duh! It's Ellen.


Sure, whatever you say, Neal.

And you need to use a dictionary once in a while,

Maxprop. A psycopath's
a mentally ill person who has little or no conscience.

Look it up, dude!

I have, but not in your Funk and Wagnalls, like you. My

knowledge is based
upon medical periodicals and texts. Psychopaths most

often *do* comprehend
the wrongness of their acts. It's their lack of normal

inhibition that
brands them 'psychologically abnormal.'

Homosexuals claim to be
mentally healthy. So that means you should excuse a

psychopath because
they're mentally ill.


Not in my vernacular. If I had any say in the matter, the

so-called
"insanity defense" wouldn't exist in our legal system.

But, you shouldn't excuse a homosexual because they're

rational and can
understand morality.
It's immoral to have sex with somebody the same sex as

you are. You deny
God when you do
it.


Perhaps *they* deny God. It's their decision, and it's

perfectly legal.


It's hardly acceptable for anyone to commit crimes and

other immoral acts
that affect others. Such crimes and acts have victims,

and there are
laws prohibiting them. But gays commit no crimes and

have no victims,
only willing participants who don't see themselves as

commiting immoral
acts.



Like Scotty said in his post down there, lots of

crimes have no
victim. Smoking pot, doing LSD like
homosexual ganz, and even most white collar crime.


Are you really that stupid? White collar crime has no

victims? Enron
stockholders might disagree.

Duh! But, homosexuality is an immoral act that
definitly affects others.


How so? If sex acts between consenting adults in private

are considered
legal, who's the victim?

You may find homosexuality immoral, but they don't.

And as long as no
laws prohibit their activities, they are free to

continue, despite your
protestations. Murderers, rapists, child predators,

thieves, and such
are not free to continue, despite the tendency of

liberal court decisions
which would seem to indicate otherwise.


*They* don't get to decide. Duh! If I don't think

having sex with a
dog is immoral is it OK to do
it.


Knock yourself out, Neal, but please don't tell us about

your canine
escapades.

There's no victim by your stupid reasoning. But, it's

illegal because
society is the victim.


Really? How so? Better think about this before

answering, because you've
got both feet in your mouth currently, and despite the

humongous amount of
excess space in there, it's getting crowded.

Lot's of laws are written to protect society. It doesn't

just protect
individuals. Your not thinking very
clear. But no liberals ever do think clear.


Wow. I wish Doug were here to see me accused of being a

liberal. Must be
some sort of a watershed moment on ASA.

Fascists pass all sorts of laws to "protect society," but

more often than
not they infringe upon or completely obviate individual

rights. And you've
still not elucidated on whom is victimized by gays.

The vast majority of AIDS cases are spread

heterosexually. Do a google
search of AIDS in Africa.


It had to get started. I said got started. It got

started by homosexual
men. That's a fact.


Yes, it is. But the WHO (that would be the World Health

Organization, since
you've probably never heard of it) has stated without

reservation that HIV
would have shown up in the heterosexual population of the

Third World had
the few male prostitutes from Haiti not contracted it

first.


So do IV drug abusers. But neither druggies nor gays

spread it to you.
So why are you bitching? Aren't you pleased that many

of them die of the
disease?


Duh, I'm bitching because their sins and immoral

behavior cost society
greatly. How would
you like it if you had to have a transfusion and got

AIDS or HepC from it.
It's happened you know.


Not in over a decade and a half. All blood and blood

products are screened
for those viruses now.

I wish all homosexuals would repent. Those who don't

will surely die (as
in not have eternal life)
God tells us that.


God likely forgives them, despite that you never will.

Ever think about the
idea that perhaps God finds your hatred of a segment of

your fellow man to
be a greater sin than homosexuality? It would be rather

humorous to find
you crossing the River Styx while the gays were showing up

at the Pearly
Gates, eh? Dress lightly, Neal.


BFD. What possible damage to society would that have?

While it might
assault your own personal sensibilities, it won't have

any overriding
impact on society as a whole.


It does too. Marriage is an important thing for a

healthy society. It
all has to do with raising
children in a proper and moral way. Anything you do that

weakens that
institution makes society sicker.


Immorality probably does have a deleterious effect upon

society. But as I
said before, most gays and many straights don't find

homosexuality to be
immoral. Abberant, perhaps, but not immoral. You seem to

forget that the
Bible was penned in a period when the perpetuation of the

human race was not
a given. Procreation was encouranged, and since gays

could not procreate, a
rational argument could be made that homosexuality was

deemed immoral in
order to promote procreation. If the Bible were written

today, the take on
gays might be somewhat different.


Homosexuality is reality. Are you planning to shelter

kids in order to
keep them from learning about an existing part of the

world? There is no
evidence that gays promote homosexuality in kids to the

point of
converting those who might otherwise become hetero.



That's the stupidest thing you kumbayah idiots say.

"There's no
evidence that homosexuals promote
homosexuality in kids." Kid's don't even know the

meaning of the word
homosexual. They have to learn it.
Who better to learn it from than a homosexual Duh.

Homosexuals claim they
can't help it. They were born
that way. So if homosexuals don't procreate like you say

then where do
they come from? They get their
parent's genes. So their parents were closet

homosexuals? Nope.
Homosexuality is learned behavior and
a choice it's proven kids learn from their parents. Duh.

Shot you down,
mr. genious.


This last paragraph was so incredibly fraught with

inaccuracy, bigotry, BS,
and outright idiocy that it would take too long to refute.

Max