View Single Post
  #152   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message

nk.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message

...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news "NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
What positive contributions have the Arab nations made to

society in
the
last 100 years?

WTF??

Are you still on the "let's launch a holy crusade to

exterminate
the
Arabs" kick?

Let's assume, for a moment, that Arabs have not made any

'contributions
to society' in the past 100 years. Does that justify a war

against
any
or all Arab and/or Muslim nations?


My comment was in reponse to the statement that all Arab nations

hate
us.
Essentially, I'm saying "who cares"...they're irrelevant in the

whole
scheme
of things...unless of course they attack us. Only *then* do

they
become
relevant...and then I *do* say that their lack of contributions

to
society
should be considered when we're deciding just how many kiloton

nuke
we
should drop on 'em.


What positive contributions have *you* made, NOBBY?

Many. Let me use an anology. Were I to be arrested, for

instance,
the
judge
would look at my long list of positive contributions to my

community...and
his punishment would be doled out accordingly. If I were a

jobless
vagrant
who had many run-ins with the law and never contributed anything

useful
to
society, I'd have a lot harsher punishment. It happens all the

time
in
our
justice system. I'm saying "let's apply the same standard to

nations".

Time to bomb Iceland, then.

Obviously the point zipped right over your head. If Iceland were

turning
out terrorists as rapidly as the Middle East, you'd have to weigh

its
positive contributions vs. its negative contributions to society

when
deciding what level of punishment to inflict upon them.

What about the terrorists the U.S. are "turning out"? Should we bomb
ourselves? It' pretty shallow of you to think that if any global
occurence doesn't fit YOUR idea of *good*, then the country where that
instance occured should be bombed. Purely childish, grow up.


*My* idea of good? You mean, there are sane people in the World who
actually think that intentionally targeting women and children in

terrorist
attacks is a "good" thing? Are you one of those ****-ups?


No, you are, NOYB. We just done that....in Iraq.


"We just done that"? LOL. Classic.

Nevertheless, are you saying we *intentionally* targeted women and children
in terrorist attacks? Remember, the key word here is *intentionally*.