View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JimH JimH is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 983
Default Practice, practice, practice


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
On 1/14/2007 9:18 AM, JimH wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:47:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 1/13/2007 10:31 PM, JimH wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:rchqh.14082

I would guess that it is a lot greater number than that. Overall,
smoking does not cost the non smoking taxpayer anything.
Huh?

Studies show that cigarettes bring in a lot more money in taxes than
are
paid out in health care costs. And smokers die a few years earlier
than
non smokers, so there is less Social Security and Medicare paid out.
Very
simple equation.

Please tell the insurance companies to reduce my health care insurance
premiums as smokers do not have any impact on their costs.

I am a taxpayer and the health care costs of smokers impact my health
care
premiums.
Damned straight it does. For several years, I had direct access to a
huge database of insurance information, including comparative
statistics
on smokers and non-smokers. Smokers without exception had substantially
more hits against the insurance for all sorts of reasons.

What we are getting here is obfuscation and rationalization from
smokers .
Smoking in the home where children are present ought to be a serious
misdemeanor and if repeated, a felony.

Fortunately, almost all the good restaurants in these here parts have
banned smoking, and smoking is also banned in almost all office
buildings downtown. I hope it is next banned from the sidewalks in
front
of buildings. Who the hell wants to smell the stench created by a
cigarette smoker? Blech.


In terms of health dollars, drinking alcohol causes more health
problems in terms of dollars spent than smoking.


According to these articles smokers cost us $73 billion in health care.

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkele...6/smoking.html

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/co...o_Business.asp

According to this article excessive drinkers cost us $35 billion in
health care.

http://www.forbes.com/2006/08/22/hea...0822costs.html

Also (from the ACS link):

Statistics related to the cost to business of employee tobacco use
include the following data from published reports:

Cigarette smokers are absent from work 6.5 days per year more than
nonsmokers.

Approximately eight percent of a smokers working hours are spent on
smoking rituals.

Smokers make about six more visits to health care facilities per year
than nonsmokers. In a study of health care utilization in 20,831
employees of a single, large employer, smokers had more hospital
admissions per 1,000 (124 vs. 76 admissions), a longer average length of
stay (6.47 vs. 5.03 days), higher average costs for outpatient visits
($122 vs. $75), and a higher average insured payment for health care
($1,145 vs. $762).

Average lifetime medical care costs for male smokers are 32 percent
higher than for men who have never smoked. For female smokers, that cost
is 24 percent.





Your stats match the trends I saw when I had access to insurance company
statistics.

Most smokers smoke all day long. Most drinkers are occasional drinkers,
and might go weeks or months between a drink or two. I had a beer in
November at Mexican restaurant, and haven't had another since. I had a
margarita New Year's Eve, and haven't had another hard drink since.

Smokers are as self-deluding as alcoholics.


There is no doubt that drunk drivers kill thousands annually. And I am sure
Tom's viewpoint is somewhat biased based on his service with the EMT's and
seeing folks killed on the road from drunk drivers.

But there is also no doubt that smoking (including the effects of second
hand smoke) is more of a killer and a drain on our health care dollars.