If you saw a movie in which a guy in colonial wardrobe was saying the exact
same thing about the British rulers, you probably would've told your kids to
come into the living room to watch it because it was inspirational.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...
She has a right to question, especially as a leader of the Democratic
party.
Even has a right to slant the speech, but it was a bunch of polemic
blathering.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Marty Feldman wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about
Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to
facts.




fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.



A discussion about whether Bush is competent to be POTUS is relevant
under any circumstances, and at any level. The POTUS is the most
important person in the world, and if, as now, a nincompoop holds the
job, we're in a world of ****. As we are now.

Pelosi performed a valuable public service by questioning Bush's
competency. Hopefully the question will reverberate on the Sunday
discussion shows, and make its way into the general media this coming
week, despite ongoing GOP efforts to stifle free speech and sniping by
those who think it "unpatriotic" to point out the dangerous shortcomings
of the current administration.

We're less than two months out from Bush's announced Iraqi takeover of
that country. With the situation in Iraq as bad as it is today, you have
to wonder if there will be any Bush-picked "leaders" of Iraq still alive
by then to take over anything.

Personally, I don't think we'll be in Iraq long enough for it to beome
the quagmire Vietnam became, but Bush's incomptency certainly has turned
his efforts in Iraq into a debacle.

We cannot afford four more years of George W. Bush.