Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 13 Dec 2006 04:47:30 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 09:22:50 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...NGE5MTQ211.DTL

Here 'ya go Bassy - instead of the sfgate, try some real science fro
the experts.

Where you are dead wrong is your belief that the "science" in the
article came from sfgate. It didn't. Try reading again. You'll see
where it came from, including NASA. As for your article, what makes you
think that THAT particular article is good, sound science, but articles
to the contrary from other scholars and study centers is not?

Essentially yes.

We can make this very simple. How do you know for a fact that the
scholars and study scientists in the article I posted are wrong? You've
stated that your post is "real science". That would make one think that
the universities, NASA, and other study groups are not engaging in
"real science" your eyes.