whipping or dipping?
"Maxprop" wrote
As for top-posting or bottom-posting, the old adage "when in Rome . . ."
Brain-dead conformist!
Edgar wrote:
Well, is it not discourteous to asume that all your readers have such a
short attention span that they have to re-read everything from way back so
that they can catch up?
Right, that's why I generally cut a lot of quoted previous
posts, just enough to get the drift if you haven't followed
the whole thread.
It is lazy and inconsiderate to make people scroll down a couple of screens
just to read something like 'I agree' or 'You are an
idiot/gayboy/lubber/sockpuppet/whatever.
Yep. That's totally lame.
End of rant- and hey! it was bottom posted after snippage!.
As is proper & intelligent.
DSK
|