Thread
:
hunters, fishermen and landowners in Pa.- interesting rights and responsibilities under laww
View Single Post
#
2
posted to rec.boats.paddle
Bill Dunkenfield
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 3
hunters, fishermen and landowners in Pa.- interesting rights andresponsibilities under laww
wrote:
Pennsylvania's statute, 18 PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. § 3503 (West 2000), is
based on the Model Penal Code's trespass provision, which does not
specifically mention hunting but requires posting (or fencing or
enclosing) to exclude all trespassers from land (posting is not
required for buildings and occupied structures). See also infra notes
\l "F88"- \l "F89"
\l "B63"
Pennsylvania courts generally hold that posting is required to exclude
hunters. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Sweeley, 29 Pa. D. & C.4th 426, 433
(C.P. 1995) ("Open lands that are not posted or fenced off are presumed
open for recreational use by the public, especially in rural counties
where hunting and outdoor activities are common."). Various secondary
sources provide general insight about whether and when landowners must
post to exclude hunters. The Model Penal Code's criminal trespass
provision, on which Pennsylvania's trespass statute is based, \l "F88"
requires landowners to post nonfenced land [*pg 565] (excluding
buildings and occupied structures) to exclude any would-be trespassers,
including hunters. \l "F89" The Restatement (Second) of Torts states
that,
This sounds like the current laws are working well.
What is your problem with the way things are?
JAM
Reply With Quote
Bill Dunkenfield
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Bill Dunkenfield