Eisboch wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

Eisboch wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...


Subtotals so far:

Personal remarks: Don White, P Fritz, Thunder (one each)
Insults: John H, Don White, Basskisser (one each)
Argumentative challenges: JohnH 1, Reggie Smithers 3
Catty remarks: Don White, 1
Political Statements: JohnH 1, Don White 1, Eisboch 1, Fritz 1,
Basskisser 1


And the winner..... by a landslide!

Da -ta-ta- da ......

Chuck Gould .... with over 15 sarcastic comments on thread that otherwise
did not involve him.

Congratulations, Chuck.

Eisboch

At least I did not hypocritically claim that I "wasn't following" the
thread.

How truly amazing that you and the other combatants in this thing would
post your nasty, snide, and inflammatory comments in a public forum and
then get all ****y when somebody
keeps track of who said what.


My single post related to this thread was "nasty, snide, and inflammatory"?
You make tough rules, Chuck.

Eisboch

Don't give yourself so much credit. The group remarks in general
included some that were
nasty, snide, and inflammatory. Yours were merely inflammatory,
challenging Don White to
somehow prove or disprove that Canadians are more generous than
Americans. Sounds like a first class boating topic to me. (Unless you'd
want to call your later remark to me "snide", but I wasn't including
that in my reference).

Inflammatory remarks and all trolls should be posted in rec.bAITs.

For a guy who only scored one point, before I gave up keeping score,
you sure got your hackles up in a hurry.

Why wouldn't it be fairly obvious that remarks posted to a public forum
will be noticed by somebody? So, the question is this: Is it the
greater offender who comments on the quality and content of the remark,
or the greater offender who posts the remarks to begin with?