John H wrote:

On Thu, 20 May 2004 19:41:38 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:03:30 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:



wrote:


Actually... If you read more than the area bolded in the story, you will
find this tid-bit of information

"A 155-mm shell can hold two to five liters of sarin; three to four liters
is likely the right number, intelligence officials said."

Granted the portion you quoted does say

"Tests on an artillery shell that blew up in Iraq on Saturday confirm that
it did contain an estimated three or four liters of the deadly nerve agent
sarin (search), Defense Department officials told Fox News Tuesday."

But the big word in your quote is "ESTIMATED"

It then goes on to say


""A little drop on your skin will kill you" in the binary form, said Ret.
Air Force Col. Randall Larsen, founder of Homeland Security Associates. "So
for those in immediate proximity, three liters is a lot," but he added that

from a military standpoint, a barrage of shells with that much sarin in them

would more likely be used as a weapon than one single shell."

And further to say

"Upon impact with the ground after the shell is fired, the barrier between
the chambers is broken, the chemicals mix and sarin is created and
dispersed."

So technically Basskisser is correct in his statement that the shell did not
contain Sarin, since the Sarin would not be completed without the mixing of
the 2 chemicals.

Semantics are a wonderful thing....

"NOYB" wrote in message
.earthlink.net...



I'm stupid? Hell, man, apparently you don't even know how to read. The
stories that you are quoting, are saying that the bomb found had the
POTENTIAL to contain 3 or 4 liters.

Hey Mr. Intentionally Obtuse,
The report said the following:
Tests on an artillery shell that blew up in Iraq on Saturday confirm that

it



did contain an estimated three or four liters of the deadly nerve agent
sarin...

Not "pontential" to contain...*DID* contain.






Don't confuse Nobby....he are an engineer.


At least, Harry, he's something. Without b'asskisser, what would you be?

John H


\\


Still the owner of a boat you covet...


Nope. I've changed my mind about cabins on boats.

John H

I thought it was Mrs. Herring who liked the idea of a full-headroom
cabin on a boat. I think you said that to me last year at the marina.
But maybe not.