It's not for me. It's for people who can't afford it otherwise.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message


Perhaps, but such individual unintended consequences don't affect the
entire population of the country.

Really? I think you need a history lesson.

I'm all ears, Jon.

Have you given any thought as to how to pay for it? Remember that you
won't be providing care for 4.5 million, rather 300 million.

Tax the rich of course.

While you may wear tights, you are definitely not Robin of Loxley.

And while we're on the subject, IIRC you are over 50. Does it bother
you that Hillary's health care proposal denied a good many medical
services to people over 50, such as dialysis and heart valve
replacement? Apparently she deemed those over 50 to be expendable. And
here's a flash for ya--the Canadian and Norwegian health care systems
ration health care similarly. Where do you think Hillary got her basic
concepts for federalized health care?

Where do you get this stuff

From the same synopsis of Hillary's health care proposal that was provided
to members of Congress.

and why do I care what Hillary proposed in 1992?

Maybe because if she's elected to the highest office in the land that we
might see this same proposal again? AND because any federalized health
care plan will have rationing of services. Someone has to suffer in order
to care for the masses.

Did you honestly believe that federal health care would actually take care
of you in a manner you'd find acceptable?

Bwaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Max