Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Okay, I will change the wording to you inferred there were no Christmas
lights before electricity. And your favorite charity is short $75.

No, I didn't infer a damned thing. You screwed up once again, by not
comprehending what you've read, once again. Now, let's recap, shall we?
The discussion that I was replying to was about putting electric lights
on Chuck's boat. With me so far? Then JohnH said that he should put up
a sign on his boat stating that "these are NOT Christmas tree lights".
Do you understand THAT part? It's important that you do, because if you
don't, you'll never get it. Note, please, that Chuck is putting
ELECTRIC lights on his boat. Okay, my question was, how could the
lights possibly be specifically for Christmas, because they didn't even
HAVE electric lights then. Get it now? Somehow I doubt it.



You dumb ****, I hope your drafting is better than your logic.
"Okay, my question was, how could the
lights possibly be specifically for Christmas, because they didn't even
HAVE electric lights then."
Right here you are saying specifically Chistmas lights had to be electric.

BWAAAHAAAAA!!!!!! Damn you ARE dumber than a post, Bill!!!! First, your
question was never, until now, "how could the lights possibly be
specifically for Christmas....", Let's recap, read aloud, and think,
now Bill. Try it. Maybe have your wife read what I said, maybe she has
some reading comprehension abilities. YOU said that I stated that there
were no Christmas tree lights before electricity. NEVER said that,
never inferred that. I did, however, state, when JohnH said that Chuck
should put a sign on HIS BOAT (WHICH HAS *ELECTRIC* LIGHTS ON IT) that
these lights aren't Christmas lights, that they couldn't possibly be,
because they didn't have electricity then. HOW in the hell can ANY sane
reasonably thinking person spin that around in their brain to somehow
come to the conclusion that I said there weren't any Christmas lights
before electricity????? Sheesh....