"DSK" wrote
Even Dick Cheney agrees that he was given intel
data showing that Saddam's WMD programs were either feeble or
nonexistent... he just ignored the data...

NOYB wrote:
Not true.

This is from January 19th, 2004:

Cheney says it's too soon to tell on Iraqi arms
By Judy Keen, USA TODAY
LOS ANGELES - Vice President Cheney says he believes "the jury's still out"
on whether Iraq had the chemical and biological weapons that were the Bush
administration's justification for war.
"I am a long way at this stage from concluding that somehow there was some
fundamental flaw in our intelligence," Cheney said in an interview with USA
TODAY and the Los Angeles Times


And this is a long LONG way from his iron-clad determination that Iraq
*definitely* had WMDs and we had to attack very soon to eliminate the
imminent threat of them.

Now he's saying "the jury's still out." Hmmm...


BTW what do you think about the CIA and NSA staff saying that they told
Cheney point-blank that there were indications Iraq did not have WMDs?
How about all the foreign intel that's been published since? How about
the UN (remember them, the guys whose mandate we are theoretically
enforcing) weapons inspection team's findings?

In short, there is no way short of hysterical delusion can you claim
that *all* the intel on Iraw showed unequivocal evidence of WMDs. Oh
wait, you're the one who thinks it would be just peachy to start a world
war to exterminate all Muslims... why am I trying to talk sense to you
NOBBY??

DSK