Dave wrote:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:36:19 -0500, Walt said:

But, speaking as one of those dreaded enviros, I could
be persuaded that a limited application in situations where malaria is
particularly bad would pass the cost-benefit analysis test. In North
America, there is clearly no need to lift the ban.


I'm inclined to agree with that. Now you just have to persuade the folks to
whom environmentalism is a religion, and a rather absolutist one at that.

Ok. I'll go out and try to convert your straw men, assuming I can find any.

//Walt