( OT ) Interesting numbers (if true)
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Zing wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
What? You're denying we have a dumb ass as president?
Dumb, or dumb-ass?
Well, I'm not privy to the results of his IQ test. His SAT scores were
higher than average, but that and a buck twenty five get you a cup of
coffee. Yes, the man can and does mangle the English language, but despite
what we Usenet pundits think, this is not necessarily a reflection of
intelligence. Sheesh, the libs have been saying every Republican since Ike
is an idiot (Nixon excepted - their view painted him more of an evil genius,
and they were correct that he was evil, but wrong in thinking he was a
dastardly genius). Yea, Ike, Ford, Reagan, Bush and Bush Jr. are all idiots.
Bush 1 was even a wimp early in his campaign until the lazy lib press
finally got around to digging up his service as a WWII dive bomber pilot.
How come libs get it wrong so often? Why so recalcitrant? Are they too dumb
(or dumb-assed) to ever change strategy?
Regards - Zing
|