View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jamesgangnc jamesgangnc is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 389
Default More AICW distress....

I'm thinking it is safe to say that none of that fuel tax went to
Hanover county. So how come they are being asked to cough up 3/4 mil
for icw maintenance? Hanover county's revenue, like any other county
in nc, is most likely about 3/4 property tax. The overwhelming
majority of that property tax is from people that do not have a boat
and do not have a home on the icw. So why is it that you think these
taxpayers should be paying to maintain the icw?

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:59:00 GMT, James penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

The rest of the population is getting tired of footing the bill to subsidize
a few. Wy don't you take up a collection from the local boaters and see if
you can put together 3/4 million dollars? Start things off with 5 or 10k of
your own money.


Where did you get the idea that "The rest of the population " (whoever
that is) is "footing the bill to subsidize a few?" It seems that you
have posted without all of the facts!

Commercial shippers already foot the bill, by Federal Fuel Tax, for
the ICW through The Inland Waterways Trust Fund
http://www.americanwaterways.com/ind...xes/index.html

The ICW was built, primarily for the purpose of carrying commercial
traffic, which it can do much more economically than, say 18-wheelers.

Federal Law *requires* that it be kept dredged to a depth of 12 feet
for almost all of its length and, again, Federal Law makes this the
job of the Corps of Engineers.

If you'd like to learn mo
http://www.atlintracoastal.org/

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats