Bo Raxo wrote:
wrote:
Bo Raxo wrote:
I don't think life is a right that can be forfeited. It is inalienable
and irrevocable, in my opinion.
Thats right! The Hawks lives were inalienable, and irrevocable in my
opinion too
Okay, ,we agree so far. So if it's wrong to take a human life (except
in self defense), then it's wrong whether the life belongs to a couple
of retirees or a couple of cold-blooded killers.
After all, wrong is wrong. And two wrongs don't make a right.
That's where you make the error, Bo. We want to take the lives of the
DeLeons and Machains, the Ted Bundys, the Charles Chat Ngs, and other
premeditated murderers because we are _protecting_ the lives of
innumerable others.
Executing these psychopaths means they can never get out of jail because
they've convinced a bleeding heart like you that they've "reformed". Or
they might escape. Ted Bundy managed to escape from jail, not once but
twice, and continued to kill after he had escaped.