"otnmbrd" wrote
| Interesting (I don't agree, but interesting). It also appears that we are
| getting closer to the basic reason we disagree..... what vessels you
| consider NUC.
| (further comments interspersed)
| G that's NOT what it says to me.
| Here's the reason for my original statement above. Under NO circumstances
| would I consider a vessel which had simply lost reverse to be NUC, "unable
| to maneuver as required by these rules".
| Your instructor and I disagree....when you see a NUC you have to presume
| NOTHING is possible.
| Again it appears that the basic disagreement is what vessels you consider
| NUC.


No, that's not it. The problem is you don't understand what RAM is.
It's like the Twilight Zone with this guy.....
Jeff, are you shaking your head and pulling out your hair too?

Cheers,
Ellen