Actually, I never said he was not impeached, I simply said that he was found
innocent.... Actually, I made the bold statement, by way of the conservative
news... Yes one of those right wing news publishers..

"At high noon Friday, the Senate rejected both articles of impeachment
against President Clinton, failing to get a simple 51 vote majority on
neither the perjury charge nor the obstruction of justice charge."

You know what rejected means???

re·ject
tr.v. re·ject·ed, re·ject·ing, re·jects
1.. To refuse to accept, submit to, believe, or make use of.
2.. To refuse to consider or grant; deny.
3.. To refuse to recognize or give affection to (a person).
4.. To discard as defective or useless; throw away.
Even the right wing "refuse to accept, submit to, believe, or make use of"

Must be bad that all the wanna-be pundits are holding on to something nobody
else is....

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:hzApc.8567$gr.647885@attbi_s52...
The gentleman did not say anything about wither he was found guilty, but
everyone knows he was not. The gentleman said he was impeached, which he
was. You are the one who said he was not impeached. I hate to tell you
this, but you were incorrect.