"basskisser" wrote in message

Using YOUR analogy, one could also say he simply can't be said to be
doing GOOD, then right?

Right. And I never did say that. It's essentially an even race.


The general analysis right now is
that if Nader garners more than 3% - 5% of the vote, it will be
impossible
for Kerry to win. That is very thin support indeed.

With Bush now at less than 50%, the exact same thing could be said of
him!

sigh What does the 50% point have to do with it? There are no reasonable
scenarios wherein a 5% Nader vote causes Bush to lose and Kerry win. A
Nader candidacy simply does not siphon significant votes from the Republican
ledger.


He's like the guy who runs through
the entire ten-mile road race far back in fourth place, but wins when
the
first three contenders all get tangled and fall a half-mile from the
finish
line.

As long as the ignorant, lying, cheating, scum bag falls all the way
to Crawford, Texas, fine!

What are you talking about? There was no one from Crawford in the Dem
primaries. Please try to keep up.