So are you claiming that the Swiss should be able to carve up the cup,
replace it with a replica, and then auction off the parts for a
profit? Right, that makes sense.

Maybe they should drop it first and get the insurance company to pay
for the replica.


OzOne wrote:
On 16 Oct 2006 02:44:23 -0700, "Bart"
scribbled thusly:

As usual Oz, you don't make any sense in your statements.
You present an "either or" option, neither of which is appropriate.

New Zealand has no right to these pieces. They failed
to protect "The Cup"--none of it belongs to them.

I'd be interested to see where having the cup damaged when in your
posession negates your trusteeship.

If New Zealand wants to fund underprivileged kids in a sailing
program the RNZYS can fund it themselves--they can afford it.

They can?
Do you have access to their financial information?
While an argument could be made that the pieces should
go to Alinghi--as they currently hold "The Cup", I feel these
pieces should go back to the trustees of the American's Cup,
the New York Yacht Club.

Bart, the trustees are the winners of the Cup.
At the moment that's Alinghi!
They have less right to the bits because the cup was in NZ posession
when damaged...Alinghi had no claim.
They should be returned to the New York Yacht Club and placed
in one of their display cases with a short article on how they
came to be damaged.
Why?
When the Cup was damaged, NZ were the trustees.
If anything the junk should travel inside the cup...to be held by the
new trustee.

They should not be auctioned off.

So you would prefer that some damaged beyond repair bits of junk
shoule be put in a display case when some benefit could come from the
dreadful deed of some maniac?

In any case, Alinghi's argument is that they should have the right to
sell off the bits....do you subscribe to that?


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.