Gilligan wrote:
"Walt" wrote
Gilligan wrote:

http://lasp.colorado.edu/sorce/2004ScienceMeeting/SORCE%20WORKSHOP%202004/SESSION_3/3_1_White.pdf#search=%22sun's%20output%20global%20 warming%22

You really didn't read any of these links before you posted them, did you.


Go to my post on Faraday Paradox with Ganz. The reread the magnetic field
evolution in cycle 23.

Uh, no thanks. I know a red herring argument when I see one.

If you're losing the argument, change the subject.


See slide # 10:

Conclusions

o Solar output cannot account for rapid increase in Global Warming

Let's discuss the article.

What's to discuss? It concludes that variations in solar output cannot
account for the measured global warming.

I know you desparetely WANT for it to be that way, but that's not what
the data imply. Sorry. Wishing won't make it so.

Confusing the issue with a bunch of techno-babble may fool some of the
people. Nice try, but no thanks.

//Walt