Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 20 Sep 2006 09:12:12 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 20 Sep 2006 08:20:40 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

Charlie Morgan wrote:


Cetol gloss is an entirely different product than Cetol Marine. Cetol
Marine breathes and is very durable. I would not characterize Cetol
Marine as a "stain", either.

You may want to take that up with Sikkens. They describe Cetol Marine
as containing
"pigments". How would you characterize a non-opaque application of
pigment via an oil or water base if not as a "stain"?

Okay, now we've established that you don't even know the difference
between paint and stain.

CWM
Sorry, a renewed personal attack doesn't get you off the hook here.
Does your answer indicate that you feel Cetol is a "paint"?

If not, please reply directly and without digressing to personal
remarks to:

"How would you characterize a non-opaque applicatin of pigment via an
oil or water base if not as a 'stain'"?

(An additional personal remark or failure to respond at all will be
accepted as an indicator that you feel Cetol is a paint).

Accept whatever you want, buttplug. You'll just be wrong about a
longer list of things.

CWM
Charlie,
What is the reason for working yourself into a tizzy over Cetol? There
are people who think the orange tint looks crappy. Heck, even Cetol
sells a "light" that they proudly say is not as orange as their regular.

Your opinion that Cetol is the best thing for teak is your opinion.
There are many who agree and many that disagree. Do you normally get so
****y every time someone disagrees with you?