"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...

The ruling leaves boating open in all navigable channels, therefore
certainly doesn't "outlaw boating in all navigable waters" in the US.

All the ruling does is clarify that the riparian land owners also own
and control the shallow waters outside the main navigable channels.
While this affects rivers, creeks, etc to some extent it will effect
lakes almost not at all and coastal areas won't even notice any
difference.


Interesting how your interpretation differs so much from the opinions of the
author of the article and the MRAA president.

So why should we believe your assessment?

But you couldn't pass up an opportunity to take a shot at Clinton. Too bad.


Too bad your head is in your ass and you can't see the cause-and-effect of
poor judicial appointments and how they shape the country we live in. It
was the liberals on the SCOTUS that gave us that absurd eminent domain
ruling, and now it's a liberal judge telling us we can't operate on what has
always been considered public waterways. There's a trend. Open your eyes,
quit playing netcop, and you just might see it.