thunder wrote:
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 10:43:30 -0700, Joe wrote:


agreeded what's your problem? The president said he did not approve
torture.
I do not endorse torture, just effective questioning.

How do you think we should get intel from a captured prisioner?
Is it OK to detain and question known enemy leaders ?

Again, it depends on the President's definition of torture, doesn't it?
I think most Americans would define torture far short of the definition in
the Yoo/Bybee memo.

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/d...e80102ltr.html

And consider this, if the interrogation methods aren't legal, then there is
a very good chance that the evidence obtained is not legal. Clearly, the
14 prisoners being transferred to Guantanamo are very dangerous. It would
be a terrible injustice if this administration's bungling allows them to
escape justice.

Bwahahahahahaha...FN pussies. I hear the fat one with Bobspirts back
hair starting ratting on his mate's after 2 min of water boarding. Man
o man I've been tortured worse becoming a shellback. Been more sleep
deprived running crewboats..

My Brother was into Sea & Air rescue and has been thru the Navy pilots
POW program in florida and they make the methods mentioned in your
pansy memo look like kindergarden recess.

Why do you call yourself Thunder if you are such a pussy?
Change yor name to wimper.

Joe