"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:39:44 -0400, katy wrote:
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:46:08 -0400, katy
wrote:
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:28:25 -0400, katy
wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
news
Doug is a know nothing, non-sailing, Bag of Farts and now Gilly is
a
know nothing, non-sailing bag of farts.
That is one of the greatest compliments a person could be served.
Thank you
kindly for classifying me in the same sailing category as Doug King.
While I
believe he is leagues beyond my experience and ability, your
consideration
of me as his peer is warmly appreciated.
Thank you,
Gilligan
Those of us who know Doug, know the truth. BS obviously doesn't know
him. Neither does CWM. They should be so lucky.
You are correct that I do not know Doug personally. He knows just as
much about
me. All either of us knows is what is presented here in usenet for
evidence. I
suspect we are probably both very wrong on many counts. But all we are
ever
likely to know of each other is what gets written here, so as far as I
am
concerned, Doug will continue to be judged as the obnoxious ignorant
blowhard
who doesn't sail, but says he does. That's what has been presented
here.
Now watch for his snappy and mature response...
CWM
Yet others here have told you that he does indeed sail and sails often.
I suppose you can call us all liars, but that wouldn't be the truth.
Doug does sail, is very knowledgeable about sailing, and is very
pleasant to be around socially. He is an interesting conversationalist
and is well-informed on a variety of subjects. He also has a good
sense
of humor and is pretty laid back You can believe that or not, but as a
person who knows him in real life, I think you would do well to temper
your judgment.
Then I can expect you and Doug to temper your judgement of me as well?
You are
telling me things about Doug that are very hard to believe, given his
posts in
usenet, which is all I have to go on. I guess you would be amazed if you
ever
met me in person, as I'm really not much like my usenet persona, either.
Very
few people are.
CWM
Wouldn't know...most people I've met from this group, and it's a few,
are what they seem to be here. I guess it's how you personigy yourself.
I have no trouble with being "the real me" on Usenet..Maxprop has
confirmed on several occasions that I am in real life as I an here .I
haven't anything against you except that you make derogatory remarks
about people I condier friends. What kind of a friend would I be if I
did not come to their support?
Someone else on usenet "confirming" anything about you does not mean
anything.
Maxprop is not real. He's just another character on usenet. He used to
post
under his real name, but that was a long time ago. Now he plays a
character
named maxprop. I'm at least as real as he is. I'm also a lot nicer in
person. I
absolutely guarantee it!
Maxprop is real, if not my real name. Katy knows that. And you know that,
too. You've posted my name to everyone's attention repeatedly, as if that's
some admirable feat of cybernetic prowess or at least an irritation to me.
I don't post under my name any longer because of the problems it has brought
in the past. Maxprop is just a moniker, not a sock puppet. I've posted the
same as Maxprop as with my real name.
I'd have to suspect that you probably are a much nicer person vis-a-vis than
you appear to be by your posts. As Binary Bill you were an absurd jerk,
given to nastiness and childish outbursts. As MysTerry, you were
argumentative and caustic. As CWM you've tempered your posts to a level
that would be considered acerbic and only mildly irritating. I'm convinced
that by the time you get to your next moniker, you'll probably be an okay
sort, but I'm not holding my breath.
Max