"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"jps" wrote in message
...
Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1
years
old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in
13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have
nukes.

Bottom line: You'd prefer to send other people's kids to die or be
maimed, either physically or mentally or both.


Just yesterday, the State Dept. released a report showing that
international
terrorist incidents reached their lowest level since the late 1960's.

The report also made mention of the fact that they didn't "count" the
attacks made against our troops in Iraq, because those attacks were made
against combatants.

The decline in terrorist incidents must be from one of two things:
1) we've been pretty successful in our war on terrorism
or
2) the terrorists haved focused their attacks on our armed troops...people
who are much better equipped to fight back than civilians in the WTC

Since you liberals refuse to acknowledge that Bush's war on terrorism has
been pretty darned successful, then that means you have to credit the drop
to reason number 2 mentioned above. If that's the case, then I'll ask
you:
Wouldn't you rather the attacks be directed against our forces (who are
better trained and equipped to defend themselves) than some innocent
American just going about his/her daily life?



Yes. However, it would be even one step better if we'd learn to stop
recreating the problem over and over again, and if the comfortables, like
you, would entertain the right amount of rage when your leaders choose NOT
to learn.