NOYB wrote:
(snip)
Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into
Iraq.

When are the trials going to begin to prove this point?


Well Jeez, Saudi Arabia was a safe haven and provided funding for al
Qaeda long before we went to Iraq. Further, 15 or the 19 hijackers who
conspired to kill 3000 of our brethren were Saudi nationals. Why didn't
we invade their country?

Because our economy couldn't handle the economic shock of the lost oil
supply. Of course, Iraq provides not only the staging area to strike
against the other countries in the region...but also enough oil to keep
our economy going should bin Laden successfully oust the Saudi royals.

You admit this was all about oil now.

Maybe we should look to become more Hi-Tech in order to free us from a
limited supply of a resource and stop exporting technology abroad along
with jobs. Nobody needs the damn oil if they can't afford it.




There's plenty of evidence of terrorist activity in Saudi Arabia right
now!

Isn't that who we were looking for? Tell them to bring them to us in
handcuffs or else. NOW!!!!




Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not
be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them
from the rest of the Middle East.

Is this the way you see the "plan".


Would you like to
send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1
years
old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes.

There are countries with nukes now that were building rockets (fireworks)
before the Europeans knew what gun powder is.
They never have liked us very much either.
Will your kids want to defend us against them when we've been bankrupted
like Russia was.

I don't see your profession as being so secure, that enough "health care
professionals" couldn't be trained to take over many responsibilities, that
you are charged with now. That's what you hear from this administration.
Retrain the unemployed. Why not?

Then the attention may fall on the brotherhood of orginizations that you
belong to, and be seen as a group that inflates health care costs that
needs to be stopped. Can you say, Union Busters.

I have no idea what the "plan" is. I'm not sure there is one.
There is no need to reply, I just don't see, what you see.
--
__________m___~¿Ô___m____________________________